Comments on: The Folly of Guantanamo Bay http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/ Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:26:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: John Scott http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-196 John Scott Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:13:58 +0000 http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-196 “If you keep voting for the lesser of 2 evils you’ll forget you are voting for evil.” Great quote! “If you keep voting for the lesser of 2 evils you’ll forget you are voting for evil.”

Great quote!

]]> By: cldnails http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-121 cldnails Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:53:49 +0000 http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-121 I saw a quote some where the other day that said, "If you keep voting for the lesser of 2 evils you'll forget you are voting for evil." Or something to that effect. I'm honestly concerned and scared every day I look at the news, the political candidates for president, and think these are the BEST our Nation has to offer? I saw a quote some where the other day that said, “If you keep voting for the lesser of 2 evils you’ll forget you are voting for evil.” Or something to that effect.

I’m honestly concerned and scared every day I look at the news, the political candidates for president, and think these are the BEST our Nation has to offer?

]]> By: kerrin http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-119 kerrin Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:10:21 +0000 http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-119 cldnails, I have done the same. I guess I'm just tired of where that mentality has taken us. So now I will vote for change even if I am fairly certain that personal will not be elected. I figured that in most other situations, where I had a choice, I would never settle for the lesser of two evils. cldnails, I have done the same. I guess I’m just tired of where that mentality has taken us. So now I will vote for change even if I am fairly certain that personal will not be elected. I figured that in most other situations, where I had a choice, I would never settle for the lesser of two evils.

]]> By: cldnails http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-117 cldnails Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:30:39 +0000 http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-117 I see. Monkey balls. :) I've always felt it's the lesser of 2 evils when voting for political offices. So yes, monkey balls. I see. Monkey balls. :)

I’ve always felt it’s the lesser of 2 evils when voting for political offices. So yes, monkey balls.

]]> By: kerrin http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-110 kerrin Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:22:26 +0000 http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-110 my point is that so many so called "conservative" politicians say they don't support big government but their actions are to the contrary. how many major political candidates calling themselves "conservatives" are in favor of no child left behind (more government & spending), department of home land security (more government & spending), & faith based initiatives (more government spending) the list goes on. it seems like most "conservative" politicians are in favor of these "big government" programs ergo they are "liberal" in their spending. this is why, generally speaking, is one of the reasons I am in favor of neither Democrat or Republican parties and think they both suck monkey balls. my point is that so many so called “conservative” politicians say they don’t support big government but their actions are to the contrary. how many major political candidates calling themselves “conservatives” are in favor of no child left behind (more government & spending), department of home land security (more government & spending), & faith based initiatives (more government spending) the list goes on. it seems like most “conservative” politicians are in favor of these “big government” programs ergo they are “liberal” in their spending.

this is why, generally speaking, is one of the reasons I am in favor of neither Democrat or Republican parties and think they both suck monkey balls.

]]> By: cldnails http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-109 cldnails Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:07:00 +0000 http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-109 Um, 'liberals' are the ones pushing big government, in terms of socializing everything we do. Just because they think it's alright to murder the unborn and allow homo's to marry doesn't make them opposed to Big Government. I suppose it does depend on who we are pointing the finger at, but generally speaking 'conservatives' one market to dictate, not government. So, I guess I miss your point...? Um, ‘liberals’ are the ones pushing big government, in terms of socializing everything we do. Just because they think it’s alright to murder the unborn and allow homo’s to marry doesn’t make them opposed to Big Government. I suppose it does depend on who we are pointing the finger at, but generally speaking ‘conservatives’ one market to dictate, not government.

So, I guess I miss your point…?

]]> By: kerrin http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-108 kerrin Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:10:01 +0000 http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-108 cldnails, that is true but most other "conservatives" running for major political office are advocates of big government and therefore "liberal" in their spending just like Bush. When it comes to personal rights & freedoms Bush is not "liberal" he is authoritative like most other candidates running Democrat or Republican. cldnails, that is true but most other “conservatives” running for major political office are advocates of big government and therefore “liberal” in their spending just like Bush. When it comes to personal rights & freedoms Bush is not “liberal” he is authoritative like most other candidates running Democrat or Republican.

]]> By: cldnails http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-107 cldnails Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:58:52 +0000 http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-107 I'm sure you realize this, but most conservatives don't consider Bush a conservative. He's about as liberal as it gets and still wear the conservative tag. I’m sure you realize this, but most conservatives don’t consider Bush a conservative. He’s about as liberal as it gets and still wear the conservative tag.

]]> By: kerrin http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-92 kerrin Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:35:00 +0000 http://www.individualsovereigntist.com/2007/12/05/the-folly-of-guantanamo-bay/#comment-92 Agreed. This is a typical Supreme Court punt on an important issue. Rather then actually deal with the issue they produce a "Catch 22" punt that just means someone else will deal with it (i.e. Bush for now fills the void). The Liberals and Conservatives in American politics are one in the same, now a days, when it comes to an individuals rights & freedoms... they both want the power to be "judge and jury" of the citizens. I currently only see one politician who is speaking against this nonsense and that is Ron Paul. Agreed. This is a typical Supreme Court punt on an important issue. Rather then actually deal with the issue they produce a “Catch 22″ punt that just means someone else will deal with it (i.e. Bush for now fills the void).

The Liberals and Conservatives in American politics are one in the same, now a days, when it comes to an individuals rights & freedoms… they both want the power to be “judge and jury” of the citizens. I currently only see one politician who is speaking against this nonsense and that is Ron Paul.

]]>